Tuesday, January 10, 2006

I thought that I would jump right into the Alito hearing speculation. I was happy to hear that Alito said that he thought Robert Bork of Reagan era fame was one of the most "outstanding nominees of the 20th century" and was "unjustifiably rejected" (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/08/AR2006010801165.html). According to Senior Analyst at the Daily Show, Stephen Colbert, Bork was actually rejected because of his wearing a doo rag to his confirmation hearings, that and his being crazy. But I digress.
It will be interesting to see how the Republicans react to Alito's testimony today. An open mind on abortion does not sound like the requirements that Sam Brownback of Kansas laid out for the next justice. Following the nomination of Harriet Miers, he demanded that the next nominee be clearly against abortion. Considering his lack of dissent in the process so far, one must wander how open Alito has been with some on his actual opinions on the subject. This topic is even more intriguing with news that the staunchly pro-life James Dobson is launching an ad campaign in support of Alito (http://www.family.org/cforum/news/a0039112.cfm). I would imagine that if this support from extreme conservatives continues, we can fill in the blanks on some of Alito's positions.

Wednesday, January 04, 2006

DailyKos Picks Up on the Power Issue

'Bout time, great site that has largely missed the boat here on what's really going on with Bush Supreme Court appointments, Amando picks up on signing statements, and Alito's radical view of executive power. Front pagers at DailyKos didn't get it with Roberts, didn't get it with Miers, but they're finally getting the picture on Alito.

Tuesday, January 03, 2006

Alito's Executive Power: The Link is Revealed

One last post before I go off to Mexico where I'll post if I have a chance, in the meantime, myself, and others have talked in the past about Bush's desire to pack the Supreme Court with executive power judges. With Roberts the agenda was made clear by looking at the Hamdan decision, and with Miers it was apparent through her proximity to the President, and the fact that her proximity seemed to be her only redeeming quality. With Alito however, its not obvious, though Bush's recent domestic spying program provides some insight. Dahlia Lithwick had previously made the connection that the executive power warning with Alito revolves arround his hostility to 4th amendment claims and his deference to law enforcement in such cases. A judge who allows law enforcement to search anyone for any reason would be very useful to an Administration that wants to drop eaves on American citizens without warrant.

Liberal Oasis has managed to finally clear up the confusion today with new insights provided from Alito memos when he worked in the Reagan Administration. The link between Alito and Bush's view of executive authority become much more clear in light of these revelations.
That is Bush’s signing, last Friday, of the bill which included what’s known as the McCain Amendment, banning torture of detainees.

As Balkinization and MyDD have noted, Bush included a “signing statement” along with the bill, which read in part:

The executive branch shall construe [the provision] relating to detainees, in a manner consistent with the constitutional authority of the President to supervise the unitary executive branch and as Commander in Chief and consistent with the constitutional limitations on the judicial power, which will assist in achieving the shared objective of the Congress and the President ... of protecting the American people from further terrorist attacks.

As Balkinization said, “Translation: I reserve the constitutional right to waterboard when it will ‘assist’ in protecting the American people from terrorist attacks.”

Or as MyDD said: “I'm the President, and you can't enforce jack.”

Wait a second, you might say, what the hell is a “signing statement” anyway?

It’s a concept cooked up by Sam Alito, back when he was in the Reagan Justice Department, to diminish the weight of the congressional record and increase the weight of the president’s whims when the Supreme Court interprets the law.

Bush is a big fan of Alito's signing statements, though as the W. Post noted, the Supreme Court has not given them nearly as much weight as congressional debate when determining a law’s intent.

Signing statements, that's the link. A way for the President to bypass Congressional mandates that has been given little wieght by the Supreme Court, one which Alito cooked up and Bush hopes to give weight on the High Court that it has never possessed. While I had continued to weakly follow the executive power argument before, I am once again convinced, this is all about executive power. Bush sees the Constitution as it has been interpreted in recent years to be an obstacle to the war on terror, and seeks to expand his own authority by stacking the Supreme Court with executive power judges. This is the primary issue that should be talked about in the committee hearings, not to say that other things are unimportant, but because this is the most threatening aspect of Bush's Supreme Court agenda, and Mr. Alito.